Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:00:14 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <s3cf9f79.059@gwia201.syr.edu>
Message-id: <74b1ad7736a079079a4ff4ec6971f709@mac.com>
References: <s3cf9f79.059@gwia201.syr.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Yes - Nagra speed lock is the origin of this as far as I know. Let's the director know you are with him... Maybe it goes back farther than that in the film biz.

I usually revert to a casual "go ahead" when not on a set with protocols.

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Robert Hodge wrote:

I have always liked to use " SPEED " to indicate recording. Probably has to do with NAGRA pilot tone flag indicators and VTR lockup.

Bob Hodge

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
  - From: Rod Stephens
- Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
  - From: Tom Fine
- [ARSCLIST] And speaking of cataloging
  - From: Karl Miller

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
  - From: Robert Hodge

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Longevity of Flash Memory
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] And speaking of cataloging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] proper cataloging terminology: acetate vs lacquer?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]