Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
From: Charles Lawson <clawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:02:38 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <020b01c6172d$70656c20$c28bfea9@interlinks.net>
Message-id: <fc.0010c7b2014049ac3b9aca003c5f9ea5.14049b1@capaccess.org>
References: <020b01c6172d$70656c20$c28bfea9@interlinks.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

steven c <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Keep in mind that when assembling sound recordings intended for the
>public,
>
>about 99.9% of that demographic has no particular interest in the fine
>
>points of sound quality/accuracy...

This may be true, but it is no reason for us to lower our standards. 
We're not going to solve the problem by contributing to it.

Chas.

--
Charles Lawson <clawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Professional Audio for CD, DVD, Broadcast & Internet

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
  - From: Mike Richter

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
  - From: steven c

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Risk assessment tool Q3--DAT
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Sound card recommendations

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]