Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
From: Lou Judson <inaudio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:42:30 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=sbc01; d=pacbell.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=VqadjIi7c0wzUQJmT+aW56Jh+LQn3vnZYnhkgZdji+7hcvGa2rW6gezZW4wsPjj1r h0Y2/5M5F5twovf+LJOFA==
In-reply-to: <43A1F27B.6090406@vermontfolklifecenter.org>
Message-id: <17dd9e4c6be543981c070fe18d81e02c@pacbell.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20051215131105.026fa520@hoover.stanford.edu> <43A1F27B.6090406@vermontfolklifecenter.org>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Curious why you use 48k when it has to be converted to burn listening CDs... I use only 44.1 unless going to video, and the quality is better in the end...

My partner does transcribing so the other info in your post was useful, thanks.

<L>

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Dec 15, 2005, at 2:47 PM, andy kolovos wrote:

We've been doing 16/48 mono recording using the machines and for most purposes they've been pretty darn good.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
  - From: andy kolovos
- Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
  - From: andy Kolovos

References:
- [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
  - From: Brandon Burke
- Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
  - From: andy kolovos

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Zoot suit riots audio search
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]