[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
- From: Roger and Allison Kulp <thorenstd124@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:49:18 -0800
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t8Tic0MT3GI54QR+BF3tFJaGBljZEfyS5+/WG8Nigh5LIkw5qPzggGGBnWBMsAuOThj6MzmpMLzDK25fb+gVMFbr5seycRd+vllaW68g2oiG3ZkxiVkdmKon4JptNdqVlwqvqiaqtMRiS9+QUXFgi5grKoxK+ukqflgVwPnIVZ4= ;
- In-reply-to: <001b01c60043$524e9b90$6501a8c0@tomnewdesktop>
- Message-id: <20051214004918.27861.qmail@web42003.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Many boards have a "view new posts" option,and are fully searchable.
Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I'm in Steve's camp. No time to wade through message boards.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Smolian"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
> I'm so conservative that I like it just as it is.
>
> Steve Smolian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger and Allison Kulp"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] message board vs. listserv
>
>
> > Yes.I would prefer a message board.Roger
> >
> > Brandon Burke wrote: All,
> >
> > Curious as to how many list members might prefer a message board format
> > over the standard email listserv currently in place. Message boards make
> > more sense to me for the following reasons:
> >
> > 1. Generally speaking, it is difficult to browse the ARSClist
> > archives. Especially if a topic began in one month but continued into the
> > next, as the two parts tend to become divorced from one another.
> >
> > 2. With a message board, one can view both the original topic/question/etc
> > and all subsequent responses in one fell swoop, something that comes in
> > particularly handy when performing searches in the archives. As it stands
> > now, all posts in the archives must be viewed individually, losing much
> > narrative/conversational flow along the way.
> >
> > 3. When a list member changes the name of a thread in mid-conversation,
> > subsequent posts again become divorced from the original topic.
> >
> > 4. Let's be honest, on chatty days, the in-box traffic can get a little
> > overwhelming...especially for those of us NOT taking part in a particular
> > conversation.
> >
> > For the record: Yes, I'm aware of the *digest* option...seems to me, the
> > only grievance it solves is item #4.
> >
> >
> > thanks as always,
> > Brandon
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Brandon Burke
> > Assistant Archivist for Audiovisual Collections
> > Hoover Institution Archives
> > Stanford University
> > Stanford, CA 94305-6010
> > voice: 650.724.9711
> > fax: 650.725.3445
> > email: burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Shopping
> > Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/199 - Release Date:
> > 12/13/2005
> >
> >
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping