Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
From: Karl Miller <lyaa071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:23:24 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <920DE368B74EEF4C98BA9D3FDE6598C302092EBD@exchange8b>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0508180759170.8668@larry.cc.utexas.edu>
References: <920DE368B74EEF4C98BA9D3FDE6598C302092EBD@exchange8b>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Green Richard wrote:

responding to me...

> This is an old (never-ending) debate - quick and (sometimes) dirty versus
> complete and detailed.

> Do the best you can with the resources at hand.

I am reminded of our never-ending discussions on the ultimate storage
solution. The old NEH Preservation Planning Study concluded with the
suggestion that there needed to be a "standard" solution, agreed to by all,
which would be supported indefinitely.

For me, I see both preservation and cataloging to be part of the same
challenge and inextricably connected.

Karl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Steven C. Barr

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
  - From: Green Richard

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] More on cataloging

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]