[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Seeking suggestions for an EQ device.
I would agree with Steve (if this is what you meant)
> From: Steven Smolian <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:18:49 -0400
> To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Seeking suggestions for an EQ device.
>
> Try WAVES. Just pick out the modules you need. It's a nuisance to install
> because of unaurorized use paranoia but works fine.
>
> Steve Smolian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brandon Burke" <bburke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:26 PM
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Seeking suggestions for an EQ device.
>
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> It's becoming painfuly obvious that we really need some external EQ in our
> lab.
>> All that we have now is a 3-band EQ situation [low/mid/hi] on items as
> they
>> enter the computer to get captured, Waves Restoration and then whatever
>> plug-ins come standard with Pro Tools LE. I was thinking along the lines
> of
>> something that we could pump our Pro Tools sessions through during mixdown
> and
>> then pump right back into PT. Any suggestions on models or alternate
> methods?
>> Is what I'm suggesting even a possibility?
>>
>> I should add that our budget is modest but I can usually find ways of
> getting
>> things done. This to say, nothing too fancy but nothing from Guitar Center
>> either. Know what I mean?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon Burke
>>
>> Brandon Burke
>> Graduate Research Assistant
>> Digital Library Services
>> University of Texas at Austin
>> Austin, TX
>> phone: (512) 495-4439
>> email: bburke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> * "Stand up and face the full force of a dissonance like a man." *
>> * *
>> * -- Charles Ives *
>> *********************************************************************
>>
>