[Table of Contents]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] 78s relatively inexpensive? I disagree (was Victor film)

At 04:46 PM 3/18/2004 -0500, James L Wolf wrote:
There have been some pie-charts put out there showing how much of your
$18.99 per CD supposedly goes to whom. Is there any information that
would show how income from sale of 78's was distributed? In real terms,
I would guess that CDs are cheaper to produce than 78s were because of
increased efficiency (and centralization) of methods of production and
distribution, what with global capitalism and all, and that a higher
proportion of CD revenue is profit. In any case, it would be neat to see
some good data on the changes.

Let's begin with the fact that the production cost of CDs lies where 78s cost virtually nothing - packaging. Where the labels on the 78s and the green or brown heavy paper sleeves carried an effectively zero price even then, today's jewel case, tray card and insert are likely to cost more than the 50-60 cents of a CD. Prices of both vary with quantity, of course, but paper runs more than plastic in every analysis I've seen. Fortunately, my own discs are published on CD-ROM, so the only such cost is the artwork on the disc itself - and a plain paper sleeve is optional to go into the cardboard mailer.

Mike -- mrichter@xxxxxxx http://www.mrichter.com/

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]