[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: arsclist Re: Elgar and Menuhin
In answering *this* question, I am pleased to acknowledge the help of Steve
Smolian. He gave me a Victor frequency test disk some years ago (dated
"about 1932"), and this clearly documents RCA's extension of the original
Western Electric performance. I suspect (although I have no objective
evidence) that the response above 5.5kHz (the "official" Western Electric
limit) was equalised to bring it flat (or nearly so). It is only -4dB at
10.5kHz. The constant-amplitude turnover was raised in frequency, from 250Hz
(WE) to between 500 and 600Hz (about 250 microseconds), and this
characteristic was also used for Victor's 33rpm long-playing records. The
"diamond" evidently indicates this. Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Squire [mailto:cjlocate@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 30 August 2001 17:32
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: arsclist Re: Elgar and Menuhin
During a recent visit to Hayes I discovered an internal memo, I assume from
the pressing factory (initials are WSP) to the Artistes' department dated
24th May 1934. And I quote:
"Each recording will also have a suffix, either a triangle, a square or a
diamond, which will indicate Western Electric, Moving Coil or Victor
recording system respectively, and this is also the same as formerly."
This does seem to back up footnote 3, p 174 of Elgar on Record. But does
raise the question, what was the Victor recording system? One assumes that
it refers to the acoustical process devised by Berliner.
-
For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html
Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
from the author of the post.
*********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify
the postmaster@xxxxx : The contents of this e-mail must not be
disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British
Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
*********************************************************************