[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: arsclist CD-DA versus CD-Rom (.wav) for archiving
I would urge that for the time being we create "sound recordings".
That is, formats that play when inserted into a stand-alone sound
recording playback device such as a CD player, as opposed to data
storage media that require a PC peripheral to be read, such as a
CD-ROM drive. So, one would record an Audio CD-R, not a CD-ROM (or
their DVD equivalents which are not all available yet). Convergence
will probably make this a moot point someday, but we have time yet.
Mark Tolleson
The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: arsclist CD-DA versus CD-Rom (.wav) for archiving
Author: Guy_Frost <gfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> at Internet
Date: 02/09/2000 10:36 AM
It has been my experience when determining the best access for archival
materials is to first determine who will be using the information and what
is the easiest form of access that can be provided to them. What
equipement are you providing your patrons to access the new medium? Will
you circulate the new product? You're user population should be the
driving force in this.
As a musician, I would much prefer to have a CD with individual tracks. I
would not want to stare at a blank computer while I listened to the
particular track that I wanted (however, if I had access to word
processing, etc. I could take notes while I listened. The same could
also be said about pencil, paper (regular and staff) and portable CD
player).
I also feel that CD-ROMs are at risk of being fazed out with the
availability of DVDs. Note that I'm saying at risk of and not
going to, however, U.S. government CD-ROMs are already undergoing this
transition since more information can be stored on DVDs. My experience
with DVDs also tells me they are easier to use than CD-ROMs. If all
CD-ROM producers follow suit, how long will it be before our new computers
did not read CD-ROMs but only DVDs (just like 5 1/4 and 3 1/2 floppys).
CD-ROMs will probably be around for decades still yet but these are the
things that would be going through my mind in making a decision.
*******************************************************************************
Guy Frost
Government Documents Librarian
Reference Services/Government Documents
Odum Library, Depository 0125
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
(912) 245-3748 (Office)
(912) 245-3743 (Documents)
(912) 333-5862 (FAX)
E-mail: gfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: http://books.valdosta.edu/gov/gov.html
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Pierre Fouche wrote:
> We are about to start digitising a large archive of traditional music. We
> are interested primarily in preserving the music. We have chosen CD's as
> the storage medium.
>
> However, we still have questions about the digital format. SHould we use
> .wav (CD-Rom) or CD-DA, or both? We would prefer to minimise the time spent
> making cd's, otherwise we may never complete the job with the resources
> available.
>
> CD-Rom (.wav) requires only that we save a single file, not divided into
> tracks. However, a CD-DA requires that we make individual tracks.
>
> CD-DA offers a larger distribution of players, whereas CD-Rom can only be
> played back on a PC.
>
> What is the answer here?
>
>
>
> Jean-Pierre Fouche
>
> Librarian
> ILAM
> (International Library of African Music )
> Tel: 27-46-6038557
> Fax: 27-46-6224411
> Email: J.Fouche@xxxxxxxx
>
>