[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: arsclist CD-DA versus CD-Rom (.wav) for archiving



     I would urge that for the time being we create "sound recordings".  
     That is, formats that play when inserted into a stand-alone sound 
     recording playback device such as a CD player, as opposed to data 
     storage media that require a PC peripheral to be read, such as a 
     CD-ROM drive.  So, one would record an Audio CD-R, not a CD-ROM (or 
     their DVD equivalents which are not all available yet).  Convergence 
     will probably make this a moot point someday, but we have time yet.
     
     Mark Tolleson
     The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: arsclist CD-DA versus CD-Rom (.wav) for archiving
Author:  Guy_Frost <gfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> at Internet
Date:    02/09/2000 10:36 AM


It has been my experience when determining the best access for archival 
materials is to first determine who will be using the information and what 
is the easiest form of access that can be provided to them. What 
equipement are you providing your patrons to access the new medium?  Will 
you circulate the new product? You're user population should be the 
driving force in this.
     
As a musician, I would much prefer to have a CD with individual tracks.  I 
would not want to stare at a blank computer while I listened to the 
particular track that I wanted (however, if I had access to word 
processing, etc. I could take notes while I listened. The same could
also be said about pencil, paper (regular and staff) and portable CD 
player).
     
I also feel that CD-ROMs are at risk of being fazed out with the 
availability of DVDs.  Note that I'm saying at risk of and not
going to, however, U.S. government CD-ROMs are already undergoing this 
transition since more information can be stored on DVDs.  My experience 
with DVDs also tells me they are easier to use than CD-ROMs.  If all 
CD-ROM producers follow suit, how long will it be before our new computers 
did not read CD-ROMs but only DVDs (just like 5 1/4 and 3 1/2 floppys). 
CD-ROMs will probably  be around for decades still yet but these are the 
things that would be going through my mind in making a decision.
     
******************************************************************************* 
Guy Frost
Government Documents Librarian
Reference Services/Government Documents 
Odum Library, Depository 0125
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
(912) 245-3748 (Office)
(912) 245-3743 (Documents)
(912) 333-5862 (FAX)
E-mail: gfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: http://books.valdosta.edu/gov/gov.html
     
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Pierre Fouche wrote:
     
> We are about to start digitising a large archive of traditional music.  We 
> are interested primarily in preserving the music.  We have chosen CD's as 
> the storage medium.
> 
> However, we still have questions about the digital format.  SHould we use
> .wav (CD-Rom) or CD-DA, or both?  We would prefer to minimise the time spent 
> making cd's, otherwise we may never complete the job with the resources
> available.
> 
> CD-Rom (.wav) requires only that we save a single file, not divided into 
> tracks.  However, a CD-DA requires that we make individual tracks.
> 
> CD-DA offers a larger distribution of players, whereas CD-Rom can only be 
> played back on a PC.
> 
> What is the answer here?
> 
> 
> 
> Jean-Pierre Fouche
> 
> Librarian
> ILAM
> (International Library of African Music ) 
> Tel: 27-46-6038557
> Fax: 27-46-6224411
> Email: J.Fouche@xxxxxxxx
> 
> 
     


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]