JAIC 2003, Volume 42, Number 2, Article 8 (pp. 313 to 339)
JAIC online
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
JAIC 2003, Volume 42, Number 2, Article 8 (pp. 313 to 339)




Analytical means in addition to those used in 1998 were required in order to identify the corrosion compounds. Analysis of the turquoise blue, blue, dark brown, and white corrosion products was carried out by XRD, FTIR, IC, and SEM-EDS in 1999.


For powder XRD, a Debye-Scherrer camera was used, which allows the analysis of samples as small as 1 �g. Analysis was undertaken using Cu (alpha) radiation produced from an x-ray tube operating at 40 keV and 40 mA. A Phillips PW1120/90 generator was used. The samples were ground and adhered to a gelatin strip by wetting the end in distilled water and brushing it over the samples.

FTIR characterizes the vibrational transitions of a material. It complements XRD in that it can be used for amorphous as well as crystalline materials. The use of a beam condenser and diamond cell allows analysis of sample sizes similar to those used for powder XRD. A Spectratech Sample Plan diamond cell with a 4x beam condensor on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FTIR was used. The spectra were processed and searched using Nicolet Omnic ESP software and libraries developed by the British Museum and in collaboration with the Infrared Users' Group. FTIR resolution was four wavenum-bers, and spectra were collected over 50 scans. A combination of both XRD and FTIR can be very powerful and allow a full identification to be made.

Ion chromatography is a modification of liquid chromatography permitting simultaneous determination of many anions and cations in solution, including acetate. Analysis was undertaken with a Dionex DX300 system using an AS12A column with 2.7 mM sodium carbonate and 0.3 mM sodium bicar-bonate eluant for anions and a CS12 column with 20 mM methane disulfonic acid eluant for cations.

SEM-EDS can generate elemental analysis from extremely small samples (1 � diameter). It can be sensitive and quantitative for all elements except boron and hydrogen. The samples were pressed onto a conductive carbon pad and analyzed uncoated. The very small sample size and carbon pad allowed qualitative analysis without coating. A Joel 840 SEM with Link analyzer system was used for this work. The accelerating voltage was 25 kV and the current was 1 nA.


The objects sampled for corrosion and a description of this corrosion are presented in table 1. The objects from which samples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 were removed had been chemically cleaned. Although the cleaning method used on these objects was not recorded, electrochemical reduction with zinc and sodium hydroxide is likely, based on the resulting dark, powdery, reduced corrosion (see sec. 3.3). Dark brown corrosion underlies the blue corrosion on samples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. White crystals coexist with the blue corrosion in varying quantities (fig. 1, see page 257). The dark brown corrosion (sample 7) consists of a soft powder that was easily removed from the surface (fig. 2, see page 258). The blue corrosion associated with it was also easily removed with a scalpel. The turquoise blue corrosion (sample 6) formed on top of malachite and cuprite of the completely mineralized bowl. With these other corrosion products, the turquoise blue corrosion forms a crust that is friable and easily flakes off, leaving a smooth surface underneath. The blue is intimately bound with the underlying corrosion and could not be sampled without removing the substrate. Although the bowl does not appear to have been chemically cleaned, it may have been treated with sodium sesquicarbonate (see sec. (fig. 3, see page 259).

Fig. 1. A sodium copper carbonate acetate (blue) identified from corrosion sample 1, Agora inventory no. ΠΘ 3844. Photograph by author

Fig. 2. Cassiterite and cuprite (dark brown) identified from corrosion sample 7, with sodium copper carbonate acetate (blue), Agora inventory no. AB 254. Photograph by author

Fig. 3. Copper (II) hydroxide, spertiniite (turquoise blue), identified from corrosion sample 6 (compared to cyan blue), Agora inventory no. AB 51. Photograph by author


The results of the analyses are presented in table 2. The blue corrosion (samples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) has been identified as a sodium copper carbonate acetate [NaCu(CO3)(CH3COO)], which presents similarities with the sodium copper acetate compounds found on Egyptian copper alloy objects in the British Museum (Thickett 1998; Thickett et al. 1998; Thickett and Odlyha 2000). An x-ray diffraction pattern for sodium copper carbonate acetate is not available in the International Center for Diffraction (ICD) powder diffraction file. The study of the two sodium copper carbonate acetate compounds found in the British Museum resulted in the publication of type A (Thickett and Odlyha 2000), whereas type B required further characterization. The XRD and FTIR data of types A and B are different and consistent (Thickett 2002). The sodium copper carbonate acetate found in the Agora has been compared to British Museum types A and B. The XRD data for both types of British Museum blue corrosion have been included for comparison with Agora corrosion sample 1 (table 3). FTIR data for the British Museum blue corrosion are compared with Agora corrosion samples 1 and 2 in table 4 and samples 4 and 5 in table 5. The FTIR scan that corresponds to table 4 is shown in figure 4, and the FTIR scan corresponding to table 5 is shown in figure 5. The occurrence of these compounds may become more widely recognized now that the analytical data for their identification have been published. Sample 1 presents similarities with the XRD patterns for both British Museum blue corrosion products, types A and B. Peaks that match type A

Table . Description of Objects and Corrosion Sampled
occur at d-spacings 8.6, 7.5, 4.7, 4.4, 3.8, and 3.25. Peaks that match type B occur at d-spacings 3.15, 2.78, 2.63, 2.30–2.22, 2.08, 1.95, and 1.83. Sample 1 shares peaks with types A and B at d-spacings 6.7, 2.45, 2.37, and 2.05. The FTIR scans of samples 1 and 2 are compared to the sodium copper carbonate acetate type B (fig. 4), and those of samples 4 and 5 are compared to the sodium copper carbonate acetate type A found at the British Museum (fig. 5). British Museum type B cannot be clearly characterized in the FTIR spectrum (fig. 4), and therefore the absorbances for this scan are not included in table 4. Although none of the Agora samples match exactly the British Museum compounds in these scans, similarities can be seen. Of these four samples, 4 most closely resembles the FTIR scan of British Museum type A with matching wavenumbers 517, 684, 770, and 1020 cm-1. Sample 5 most closely resembles the scan of British Museum type B with matching wavenumbers 754, 1053, and possibly 1325 and 1527 cm-1. Samples 1 and 2 present some similarities with types A and B. Samples 1 and 5 show a peak at 1600 and 1603 cm-1, respectively, which indicates a carbonate. These samples presumably contain other components that account for the nonmatching peaks. Bands in the OH stretching regions at wavenumbers 3000 cm-1 and higher are due to water or a basic (OH-) mineral. FTIR alone was not adequate for the identification of a sodium copper carbonate acetate. A combination of analytical means including XRD, SEM-EDS, and ion chromatography was necessary. SEM-EDS detected sodium, copper, carbon, and oxygen as the major elements present (see table 2). Ion chromatography of a dilute sulfuric acid solution determined the presence of both acetate and sodium ions (copper and carbonate would not be detected with the instrument configuration used) (see table 2). The presence of carbonate was confirmed by effer-vescence with 1 M hydrochloric acid. The sodium copper carbonate acetate in the Agora was found to be insoluble in water, as were types A and B in the British Museum (Thickett 1998).

The white corrosion in sample 2 was identified by FTIR as sodium acetate trihydrate (CH3COONa.3H2O) and was confirmed with XRD (table 6). Both FTIR and XRD are not sensitive to components that constitute less than 5–10% of a sample, so such quantities of sodium acetate trihydrate with the sodium copper carbonate acetate would not be detected. Sodium acetate trihydrate has been identified on objects from the Burrell Collection, Glasgow, Scotland, as either needlelike or powdery (Tennent and Baird 1992). The Agora compound presented the same morphologies. In the Burrell Collection this white corrosion was found in association with blue corrosion, as was the case at the Agora and the British Museum (Tennent et al. 1993). The reported solubility of sodium acetate trihydrate in water was confirmed in the Agora (Weast and

Table . Results of Analysis—Corrosion Products
Fig. 4. FTIR scan of corrosion samples 1 and 2 compared to sodium copper carbonate acetate type B in the British Museum.
Table . XRD Data for Sodium Copper Carbonate Acetate Compared to Agora Corrosion Sample 1
Fig. 5. FTIR scan of corrosion samples 4 and 5 compared to sodium copper carbonate acetate type A in the British Museum.
Astle 1979). The turquoise blue corrosion (sample 6) has been identified as copper (II) hydroxide, spertiniite (Cu[OH]2) (table 7). In figure 6 the FTIR scan is compared to that of spertiniite found on an Asiatic bull in the British Museum (sec. 3.2), which contained an organic contaminant (2900 cm-1). Similarities in the FTIR spectra are found at wavenumbers 420, 1582, 3317, and 3571 cm-1. This compound was indicated by elemental analysis (SEM-EDS) (see table 2) and confirmed by XRD (table 8). All diffraction bands of spertiniite were matched by the Agora sample. Diffraction lines at d-spacings 3.3, 3.0, and 2.12 indicate the presence of cuprite and perhaps cassiterite (table 9). Acetate was found by ion chromatography and may result from the adsorption of acetic acid vapors (see sec. 3.1.1) (see table 2). The dark brown corrosion (sample 7) is mainly tin oxide, cassiterite (SnO2), and copper oxide, cuprite (Cu2O). Elemental analysis (SEM-EDS) indicated mainly tin and copper with some oxygen and carbon and a trace of zinc (see table 2). XRD confirmed cassiterite and cuprite (table 9).

Copyright � 2003 American Institution for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works