Re: dry rot

To: TEXCONS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: dry rot
From: Joan Kiplinger <jkip@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:44:30 -0500
Delivered-to: texcons@si-listserv.si.edu
In-reply-to: <C2686219105A72B4B9818799DA10E8AF@ifkars10.canoemail.com>
Message-id: <403F9E1E.8040300@ncweb.com>
References: <C2686219105A72B4B9818799DA10E8AF@ifkars10.canoemail.com>
Sender: Textile Conservators <TEXCONS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

         Thank you Irene for a thorough reply. I now feel like I have
an official  license to hunt down dry rot offenders. :-D

Irene Karsten wrote:

The Book Arts discussion list recently had an interesting discussion
regarding the term "dry rot" (see the archives at CoOL).  See Tom
Conroy, 14 January 2004 for his description.

References:
- Re: dry rot
  - From: Irene Karsten

Prev by Date: Re: dry rot
Previous by thread: Re: dry rot
Next by thread: Re: dry rot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents] [Search]

Re: dry rot

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]