Subject: Conservation of African objects and authenticity
I am a graduate student in the Museum Studies program at the University of Florida with a focus on Art History. This semester, I am taking an African Art seminar and am writing my final paper on issues with the conservation of African objects, specifically those used in ritual or religious contexts. I am interested in tackling the issue of authenticity, a topic that is widely discussed usually from a curatorial angle, from a conservation perspective. A main question I seek to answer is how much can you remove from the object before it becomes "inauthentic"? Many of these objects have a life that is evident through the addition of substances, other objects, or weathering. I am referring to objects such as nails that may have become sharp and rusty or substances such as palm oil or blood that may make the object difficult to handle even with gloves. I have spoken to several conservators who say these types of substances/objects should not be removed since they are part of the object. If, for some reason, they have been removed does this deem an object "inauthentic" and not "worthy" to be in a museum? Stephen P. Mellor's article "The Exhibition and Conservation of African Objects" has been very helpful thus far in guiding my research. However, I have not found many other articles that deal with the topic of conservation of African objects and authenticity directly. I am hoping to get the perspectives of professional conservators working in the field of artifact/ethnographic object conservation. I would appreciate any thoughts you have on the subject. If you know of any publications that deal with this issue I'd appreciate you forwarding that information along as well. Kim Tinnell Graduate Student, Museum Studies Coordinator, School of Art and Art History Juried Exhibition University of Florida *** Conservation DistList Instance 24:24 Distributed: Sunday, November 7, 2010 Message Id: cdl-24-24-020 ***Received on Friday, 5 November, 2010