Subject: Injectable foam for furniture
Victoria Gill <victoria.gill [at] endangeredheritage__com> writes >To my knowledge injectable foams are polyurethane. The expansion of >the foam is exothermic and can generate a lot of heat which is >undesirable in proximity to objects. Several article have been >written on its use and failure in conjunction with Archeological >digs. However you are proposing pre-moulding and then using the form >in conjunction with the object. Polyurethane off gasses and becomes >acidic over time. Additionally in conjunction with high humidity it >can go through cycles of weeping and wetting, as it shrinks and >deforms. This is detrimental to the item. Regarding foam for use in conservation, I keep reading about problems with heat. We have used a two part foam mixture for many years in extremely delicate packing. We were also concerned about heat generation. It is true that these foams generate exothermic reaction, so we decided to measure it before considering it for use. What led us to this was a fragile plaster over wire Giacometti maquette where the wire was rusting, expanding and crumbling the plaster. We had to transport it from Oklahoma to our lab in New York. The problem at hand was being able to exert pressure on the piece to prevent loss during the rigors of transport. We decided that the two part foam would work if the exothermic reaction was not extreme. To test it we purchased thermometer heads on cables from General Electronics, and, using a mockup, we measured the exothermic temperatures (a) at the interface between a protective surface surrounding the object, where we anticipated the protective surface would bleed off some of the temperature,(b) the interior of the foam with nothing to bleed off temperature and (c) the surface temperature (with a laser thermometer). We repeated the experiment three times with consistent results. The temperature at the interface was 90 degrees(F); the internal exothermic heat was 125 degrees (F), and the surface temperature at the interface between the ambient temperature 86 degrees (F) was 91 degrees (F). We also decided to bind the piece first in linen and then surround it with bubble wrap to provide some insulation. We further decide that, in that configuration, and considering the materials of the macquette, Based on this, we used the foam for that transport, and it rode in a first class seat beside me to New York. Since, we have found foam to be a terrific transport material if used judiciously. There apparently is a maximum amount of thickness which can be poured. The fire in the Royal Saskatchewan Museum was traced to a foam exothermic reaction when it was poured too thickly. That being said, I have seen pours of a foot or more without extreme exothermic reaction. In the fire situation, I question whether the constituent materials were correctly formulated. *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:44 Distributed: Sunday, May 9, 2010 Message Id: cdl-23-44-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 5 May, 2010