Subject: Temperature control in exhibit cases
Meg Brown <megbrown [at] nc__rr__com> writes >... We are investigating the possibility of making >cases that could offer active temperature and RH control. I am >interested in hearing about experiences with active systems--negative >and positive comments. We do not have an on-staff facilities >manager and I am concerned with potential pitfalls. I am often asked to provide a combination of temperature and humidity control for special exhibition spaces. Generally, my immediate response is to point out that controlling humidity is usually relatively straight-forward, and that any sort of temperature control is complex to achieve and almost always very expensive. Humidity control can be accomplished with a combination of good casework, appropriate lighting, attention to ambient conditions, accurate measurement and logging, and the use of active and passive methods. Given the particular application, any or all of the above can be used to contribute to effective control, but careful consideration is needed to examine the application and determine the most cost effective options. Temperature control is available, but you may decide not to pursue this (most do not). It is important to note that the direct effect of temperature on most artefacts is usually considered less important than the effect of humidity changes due to temperature fluctuations. If you can effectively control the humidity level, the most deleterious effects of temperature fluctuation are diminished. It does come down to risk assessment and budget. My one observation (when asked about what does and doesn't work) is to beware the "magic bullet" approach. Humidity control is accomplished by many variables working in concert. This includes staffing, budget, scheduling constraints, and more. Jerry Shiner Keepsafe Microclimate Systems 416-703-4696 +1-800-683 4696 *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:38 Distributed: Sunday, April 4, 2010 Message Id: cdl-23-38-005 ***Received on Tuesday, 30 March, 2010