Subject: Cold storage
James Elwing <jamese [at] phm__gov__au> writes >I am seeking the names of collecting institutions that have >(successfully) embraced genuine cold storage, say 10 deg C or lower, >and certainly below 18 deg C, for a range of materials, as well as >photographic. ... For examples of cold storage for collection preservation you can look at the experiences of natural history museums with several kinds of collections: Large pelts and furs are often stored at about 10 deg. C primarily to mitigate insect pest risk. Special collections such as ice cores (and a few rare minerals) are stored at low temperatures. I expect there are Australian collections of Antarctic ice cores. Frozen tissue samples for biochemical studies are stored in mechanical freezers at -80 deg. C or in liquid nitrogen at about -196 deg. C or over liquid nitrogen at <-130 deg. C. Although a relatively new technology, we collectively have thousands of collection-years and billions of sample-years experience with that. Ideally, you would establish through a risk assessment the costs and benefits (and expected sustainability) of low temperature storage compared with other opportunities for investments in collection risk reduction. Even if the clarity of argument that is provided by a formal risk assessment is not necessary for the initial design stage it will almost certainly become essential through value engineering phases and, as energy costs rise, through sustainability reviews. Robert Waller, PhD, CAPC, FIIC President and Senior Risk Analyst Protect Heritage Corp. 622 Simoneau Way Ottawa ON K4A 1P4 *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:25 Distributed: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 Message Id: cdl-23-25-008 ***Received on Tuesday, 5 January, 2010