Subject: Rice Portrait of Jane Austen
Jonathan L. Roberts <jlro [at] btinternet__com> writes writes >I am researching the so-called Rice Portait of Jane Austen, an oil >painting attributed to Ozias Humphry RA ... > >... the argument against its being a portrait of the >novelist has partly depended on a William Legg canvas mark found on >the back of the portrait when it was restored and re-lined in 1985. >The National Portrait Gallery in London has dismissed the portrait >on the grounds that a William Legg made his first appearance in the >London Directories, as a colourman to artists in High Holborn, only >in the first decade of the 19th century, too late for Jane Austen as >a teenage girl. ... On the basis of my experience with the London Directories of this period, the *absence* of a name from them has no evidential value whatever. In the last decades of the 18th century Kent's Directory and its less-important competitors had, if my memory serves, under 20,000 entries for a city that was already in the neighborhood of a million residents. When Robson's Directory began publication in the 1820s it boasted on its title page of something like 40,000 or 50,000 entries, and rapidly drove Kent's out of business; yet there are still many plain gaps in Robson's. For the 1790s--indeed, down to the late 19th century--there are many businesses known to have existed which appear in none of the directories, or which appear in only one of several competing directories. I would suggest, with hesitation since you may already have tried this course, that an investigation of tax and parish records for Legg might help resolve the matter. I have no experience myself of these sources, but they have proved fruitful in the study of slightly later bookbinders and, I believe, printers. Tom Conroy American Bookbinders' Museum San Francisco *** Conservation DistList Instance 22:4 Distributed: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 Message Id: cdl-22-4-006 ***Received on Tuesday, 24 June, 2008