Subject: Electrolytic cathodic reduction
Diana Hamann <dhamann2000 [at] yahoo__com__ar> writes >I am a BS in Chemistry and work in conservation in a museum for >History, which preserves a large collection. As part of my Master >studies, I'm carrying out an indoor air corrosivity determination, >following the method outlined in the ISO standard 11844-2 (2005) >(Corrosion of metals and alloys--Classification of low corrosivity >of indoor atmospheres--Part 2: Determination of corrosion attack in >indoor atmospheres), by electrolytic cathodic reduction. > >... >So my question is: Is there an optimal way to connect the probes as >the working electrode, in a standard three-electrode cell? (since >welding a connector can affect or disrupt the corrosion film). I am doing regularly this type of environmental evaluation; See Impact of the environmental conditions on the conservation of metal artifacts: an evaluation using electrochemical techniques <URL:http://www.padfield.org/tim/cfys/mm/index.html> I would be glad to discuss further details with you later. But concerning your question about how to connect the working electrode in a 3-electrode arrangement, you can do it simply using a crocodile clamp (that shall of course be kept outside of the electrolyte!). The important thing when measuring tarnishing thickness is to have a well defined area in contact with the electrolyte. This can be obtained by limiting the area of the surface exposed to the solution, either by immersing a defined part of your sample, or by applying a varnish to mask part of it. In this way the electrolytic reduction of the tarnish layer can be expressed in charge per unity of area (Coulombs/mm2). At that point, knowing the chemical nature of the reduced product, you can apply the Faraday's law (Q=nFM) to determine its mass and further use its density value to calculate the equivalent thickness. Last, I would not weld a contact, since the heat generated by the procedure could disturb the tarnish film. Virginia Costa Conservare - France *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:60 Distributed: Friday, May 9, 2008 Message Id: cdl-21-60-001 ***Received on Monday, 5 May, 2008