Subject: Lacquer
Martha Seelenberger <martha.seelenberger [at] parks__nyc__gov> writes >I would like to know if anybody has heard about a certain "Nichols >Lacquer" being used on outdoor bronze sculptures. If so, how can I >get access to information on this product like, an MSDS, durability, >your own personal experience, and even which sculptures have been >treaded with this type of finishing? I am not a big proponent of lacquering outdoor metal sculptures. I have just seen too much damage to surfaces from lacquer coatings that were not applied properly (breakdown along brush strokes) or from lacquer films degrading with associated severe localized corrosion. I have seen deep corroded stripes across surfaces, the eruption of pustules with associated pitting, and ruined original patinas. Also, old degraded lacquer films can be tremendously difficult to remove and you have to have a high degree of expertise in applying lacquers to metals in order to have a coherent coating. For an object that is indoors and in a controlled environment or in certain instances where the object has to be outdoors but has severe inherent vice, lacquers may be needed. But when you choose to lacquer you have to commit to aggressive monitoring and maintenance and the associated costs. >From my experience all too often lacquered outdoor objects are just left to sit until severe problems develop. So I guess that my question would be, why lacquer? Why not apply a wax coating onto a warmed metal surface? It is far easier to maintain, does not have nearly the issues that lacquers have with blooming and orange peel, etc. and is certainly protective and can be easily maintained. I am not familiar with the specific lacquer that you mentioned but as always in conservation it is better to work with materials and properties that you know than to go with something different that hasn't been tested by science or experience. David Harvey Conservator Los Angeles, California USA *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:28 Distributed: Monday, November 27, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-28-008 ***Received on Tuesday, 14 November, 2006