Subject: Conservation principles
Mark D. Gottsegen <mdgottsegen [at] earthlink__net> writes >Of course there will always be unscrupulous or lazy conservators in >private practice. There are plenty of those in other professions >(doctors, lawyers, financial management, corporate/government >management, education, ad nauseam) and conservation is not exempt. I appreciate that Mr. Gottsegen is pointing out that all professional fields have their share of "hacks"; however the above statement leads the reader to believe that private practice is where you find unscrupulous or lazy conservators. Yes, 'hacks' can be found in any field, and I am sure that Mr. Gottsegen does not feel that all private conservators are unscrupulous or lazy. However, we need to extinguish the attitude that private conservators are more likely to be unethical and less vigilant. Institutional conservators cannot ethically provide treatment for private collections. Therefore, the only reason that the vast amount of cultural heritage held by private citizens is not lost, is through the efforts and hard work of conservators in private practice. The success of a private conservation laboratory is dependent upon one thing--reputation. If we did not act scrupulously and ethically we would be out of business. Private conservators not only have to work endless hours just to build their businesses, they also have to strive ferociously to obtain accreditation, uphold the ethical guidelines of our profession, maintain repeat satisfied customers and bring the concepts of preservation and conservation to the public. Be proud of the accomplishments of our field and our colleagues, and let the 'hacks' fall behind without any mention of whether they were with an institution or in private practice. Kyla Ubbink Book and Paper Conservator; Private Practice 6544 Bilberry Drive Ottawa, ON Canada *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:2 Distributed: Monday, July 3, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-2-008 ***Received on Tuesday, 27 June, 2006