Subject: Conservation principles
Frank Hassard <f.hassard [at] tiscali__co__uk> writes >A very well respected and senior member of the international >conservation community recently stated the following: > > "It is my belief that 'minimum-intervention' is an institutional > ploy to save money and to cover up a lack of skills." >... >Therefore, can anyone disprove this assertion by providing me with >examples of "non-like" restoration (such as those listed above) that >require greater practical expertise to apply? I think it might be important to separate reversibility of materials from skills needed in the application of the materials as stated in your inquiry >... Are "minimum >intervention" and "reversibility" conservation"s big cover-up--as >the citation above suggests? Reversibility serves a particular purpose related to future interventions. Minimum intervention in the context as expressed relates to the time a restoration intervention might take and this relates directly to the quote cited. As a paintings restorer I have also asked this same questions in cases of what I view as inadequate restorations. Usually where cleaning and/or reconstructions are seemingly incomplete. And especially in cases where damages, ie. extensive abrasion, has been left unresolved and could have been, at least in my mind, carried much further. In these cases, as well as in making non-integrated fills, philosophies regarding authenticity often are used to justify "minimal intervention." With regards to the lack of skills, in practice I do believe this does play into the equation with some restorers as well as do other negative factors, such as a lack of initiative and boredom. But I have also seen cost/time estimates by both institutional and private restorers that offer treatment options based entirely on the cost factor. This certainly does implicate the aspect of saving money. Impatience and strict time lines for completing restorations has in my experience been a source of conflict in institutions and/or with certain keepers of collections when a picture is undergoing a complete restoration. I am very interested in this subject and would like to know the context your initial citation. Can you please send it to me or send me the reference. It is an important topic rarely addressed. I do hope my comments are helpful, Laurent Sozzani Senior Paintings Restorer Paintings Restoration Department Rijksmuseum Amsterdam GAA Tol Straat 129 1074 VJ Amsterdam The Netherlands +31 20 6747294 Fax: +31 20 6747001 *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:1 Distributed: Saturday, June 24, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-1-018 ***Received on Thursday, 22 June, 2006