Subject: Retouching
It's really great to see questions and debate arising from MPU, it was after all one of the main aims of the conference--to bring these issues into the spotlight and highlight the ongoing and increasing need for collaborative research between paint manufacturers, conservators and conservation scientists. I felt that the scientific contributions to the conference offered an enormous amount of information to the conservation profession, with an acknowledgement that research in this field is still in its infancy and that the application of this information to the complex practical problems posed by works of art has to be a professional priority. My photomicrographs of the surfaces of acrylic emulsion paints also showed no evidence of damage to the surfaces of the pigmented emulsion films I tested, until I started swabbing with acetone, ethanol and xylene, which would be expected. I had to move to Atomic Force Microscopy to see any evidence for any change which essentially consisted of the removal of the surfactant layer, which we knew was happening with aqueous and polar systems from FTIR-ATR analysis. Mark is right in saying that the non-polar system I used did not remove surface surfactant, and the physical testing I did also showed that the changes in physical properties such as stiffness were also minimal. What I did find with mineral spirits--in agreement with the Jablonksi et al. AIC publication--was that colour was more easily removed, particularly with organic pigmented paints. A simple test where I put pieces of paint in water and in Stoddard solvent for 24 hours revealed that the Stoddard solvent had turned the colour of the paint, but the water had not, which translated to more colour on my swabs when I made the test more 'realistic'. Gloss levels treated with Stoddard solvent tended to vary little from the controls, and although this solvent caused the greatest amount of colour change, the actual amount was a maximum of +0.1 Delta E 94 units, which by all standards is negligible (I haven't yet looked at the possible changes caused by multiple surface cleaning treatments). The only other thing I noticed was that there was a very slight (0.1%) weight gain for samples that had been immersed in Stoddard solvent for 1 hour, when all the aqueous systems caused weight loss. It was very encouraging to read that Golden MSA varnish is at least in the short term, able to be removed, but this process needs to be investigated with respect to the long-term properties of the varnish and possible cumulative effects of multiple removal treatments on the paint films. I would think most practicing conservators would agree, and I encourage conservators to participate by painting out varnished paint samples using the methods Mark suggests, as well as solo varnish layers on various substrates and leaving them to age naturally, as we have done with many other materials. These samples, (when well documented), can prove to be very useful to all of us. *** Conservation DistList Instance 20:1 Distributed: Saturday, June 24, 2006 Message Id: cdl-20-1-009 ***Received on Friday, 16 June, 2006