Subject: Mount Rushmore
Erin Quinn <erin.quinn [at] greeleygov__com> writes >Regarding the "face lift" on Mount Rushmore, it seems that the >method was chosen for economic reasons. I heard the story on >National Public Radio (done through South Dakota Public >Broadcasting--you can hear the audio file at <URL:http://sdpb.org/>. >A German firm (thus the German excitement) volunteered to clean the >monument and teach park rangers how to do it themselves. This is incredible! We have been hearing these subtle and not so subtle threats from the pro-certification people that the NPS and other government agencies were no longer going to use people as conservators who were not certified or graduates of programs. Now they hire just anyone to "clean" two major national monuments as long as it is for free. If this is not an insult to our field I cannot imagine an greater one. I suppose it goes along with the fact that all the scientists have been fired at the old Smithsonian Conservation Analytical Laboratory. Apparently the new Smithsonian leadership has decreed that the laboratory will no longer be involved in conservation research and only act as an adjunct to the art historical brief of the staff. This is amazing since the Republicans' staff I spoke to in the House the last time they were trying to close the lab emphasized the role the lab had as a center for research in conservation for the nation's small businesses that were involved in conservation and restoration. Could it be that the new Director is doing this just to anger them, or is he not aware of the debate about the lab the last time? I urge every conservator who is the owner of a small business to start phoning their congressional representatives and set this guy straight. Niccolo Caldararo, Ph.D. Director and Chief Conservator Conservation Art Service (A private small business) *** Conservation DistList Instance 19:10 Distributed: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 Message Id: cdl-19-10-010 ***Received on Tuesday, 26 July, 2005