Subject: Intellectual property and conservation
Rebecca Bunch <rbunch [at] ncc-ccn__ca> writes >I am looking for some references or clarification regarding issues >surrounding Canadian copyright and conservation. Most of our >objects have been donated (often by the artist) or purchased by an >acquisitions committee and I am wondering if we need to contact the >artist, or their descendants directly in each case where >conservation is needed no matter how minor the treatment is. Do we >need to provide them with a treatment proposal? Is there some sort >of legal form needed? Is this even necessary? While it is best to discuss specific queries with a lawyer or solicitor who specialises in Copyright Law, it is important to note that artists whose work is still protected by copyright (e.g., living artists, or artists whose death occurred less than 70 years ago) maintain droit moral, or moral rights, over their work. These rights are not transferable, and protect the artist's work from distortion, mutilation, or modification. In Canada, moral rights comprise the following: 1. The right of association, which allows the artist to control the context in which his or her work is used, reproduced, or exhibited 2. The right of integrity, which allows the artist to control how a work is altered 3. The right to be named or not named as the author of a work It is highly unlikely that a minor treatment will infringe an artist's moral rights. In most cases, contacting an artist or an artist's estate regarding conservation treatment is unnecessary. It is in those circumstances where a treatment risks compromising the conceptual or material integrity of the object, and/or contravenes the artist's wishes regarding the care and display of the object, that consultation with the artist/estate ought to be pursued. Dr. Alison Bracker Royal College of Art London, England *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:57 Distributed: Wednesday, June 8, 2005 Message Id: cdl-18-57-003 ***Received on Saturday, 4 June, 2005