Subject: Removing bat urine stains from painted wood
Eimear O'Connell <oconnee [at] hotmail__com> writes >I am working on a painted timber charity board (originally 18th >century, with subsequent repaintings) which has been kept since its >construction in an extremely damp parish church, with a significant >resident bat population. A thick layer of accumulated dust and grime >was removed relatively easily using first dry cleaning methods and >then a 15% tac solution, but white staining--which I believe is >caused by bat-urine--has proved impossible to clean with all the >usual solvents. Does anyone have any suggestions? Understanding the chemical nature of bat excreta and the method by which deterioration takes place would be a good start. In many such cases, the white bloom is not a residue of the urine, but a deterioration product of the of the art work. Basic cross-sectional analysis should clarify this. Does the statutory permission obtained for the treatment of the painting allow original material to be removed? (if you are in a C of E church, I presume there is a Faculty). English Heritage undertook a great deal of research on this subject and the results are published in "Bats in Churches, guidelines for the identification, assessment, and management of bat-related damage to church contents". You can get this as a PDF at <URL:http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/ Filestore/publications/pdf/free/bats_church.pdf> **** Moderator's comments: The above URL has been wrapped for email. There should be no newline. Tobit Curteis Tobit Curteis Associates Cambridge UK *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:36 Distributed: Sunday, January 30, 2005 Message Id: cdl-18-36-008 ***Received on Wednesday, 26 January, 2005