Subject: Database and software for conservation records
Karen Potje <kpotje [at] cca__qc__ca> writes >... I'm trying to locate any institutional conservation departments >that can give us information on how the Museum System fares as a >tool for conservation documentation or can back us up as fellow >Filemaker-Pro users. The Tate started using The Museum System about 3 or 4 years ago. I wasn't involved in data migration, but I can tell you of my experiences as a user. While initially somewhat cumbersome, our version of TMS has evolved into one of the most useful documentation tools I have at my disposal. Each painting in the collection has an updatable TMS survey, that was migrated over from an old system. We can immediately identify the condition of that work, along with environmental requirements and other recommendations. We were able to tailor this survey to our needs and it is very quick and useful. All this information can be generated into a good variety of reports, both in words doc or spreadsheet formats. Note that a lot of our documentation is hard copy only, so we still are required to have physical files. We also have digital condition/treatment word docs, artist interviews, analytical reports and images on a central server. This data is gradually being attached to TMS files, collating previously separated data, and these migrated files may be deleted someday as everyone get used to the new system. As well as being good for our conservation documentation, we can also access other information such as location history, acquisition information, exhibition and display lists, etc. It has facilitated communication with the rest of the Tate and made life easier for us. As well, we have been able to use the search capabilities of TMS to find stats on all sorts of things, such as how many paintings in the collection have transit frames, or how many need minor treatments, or how many works are on zinc panel. This sort of information was very difficult to compile previously, but now it is a quick search away. There are a few glitches, as with any system, but I have found it a reliable and powerful tool and am really very happy that Tate chose this system. If you have specific questions, please email me and I can direct you on to the people who actually run the system for their perspective. Patricia Smithen Conservator of Modern and Contemporary Paintings *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:27 Distributed: Thursday, December 16, 2004 Message Id: cdl-18-27-010 ***Received on Thursday, 9 December, 2004