Subject: Air purification systems
Donald Farren <dfarren [at] concentric__net> writes >Does anyone have experience with relatively small, free-standing air >cleaners (of the sort that Sears sells)? They are advertised as >"99.97% effective in removing most airborne particles, including >pollen, smoke, mold spores, and pet dander". Question: How effective >are they in trapping fine dust particles, like "book dust"? Many types of indoor pollution problems are found in a building. The most effective approach is usually to remove or reduce the sources of indoor pollution. There is a special case for books dust that needs more attention. When you open a dusty book an air current is created which pushes up the dust accumulated on and inside the book directly to your nose. There are no other normal cases that you blow dust in your nose by yourself. There is may be only smoking that you blow hazardous materials including dust into your respiratory organs. When you study a dusty book, for every page that you turn this phenomena is repeated. For the whole time that you read the book you are exposed to dust. A recent research proposes that the health risk in this case is comparable to active smoking. The study suggests that the librarians who work with dusty books are in real health danger. The range of risks varies from lung cancer and heart attack to chronic asthma, allergy problems, depression, nervous problems, esthetic problems of skin etc. <URL:http://www.library-dust.com/> So if you want this air cleaner for your library the problem should be see in its global view and may be needed some measurements and a professional consulting. If you need this for a limited area of your office you need to check out if your room air fits the air flow rate and efficiency of air cleaner. Also check if it has a through HEPA filter. For further assistance please contact me at hass [at] library-dust__com Hassan Bolourchi Chemical Engineer, Ph. D. Library Dust Consulting, LLC *** Conservation DistList Instance 18:2 Distributed: Friday, June 18, 2004 Message Id: cdl-18-2-006 ***Received on Wednesday, 9 June, 2004