Subject: Decision-making
**** Moderator's comments: Please respond directly to the author and if of general interest post it here as well Making decisions in special collections conservation In late July, 2004 I am convening a workshop, sponsored by the American Institute for Conservation and with assistance from Daniel Traister (a rare book curator at the University of Pennsylvania), entitled "Values and Decision Making in Special Collections Conservation." The workshop, directed at mid-career conservators who care for primary sources, will explore a broad range of interpretive strategies employed by contemporary scholars, and we will examine the impact that conservation treatment may--or may not--have on research. In preparation for one very specific aspect of the workshop, I'm turning to scholars, curatorial/archival staff, and others who work with primary sources (excluding, in this context, sources born digital) for your thoughts on one dimension of the complex issues that digitization of primary sources has introduced. My questions are these: * In your research (or that of your patrons), if high-resolution digital images of the artifact are available, what--if anything--makes it necessary to use a primary source in the original? * Can you think of examples of research you (or your patrons) could *not* have conducted with digital images of the artifact? We all know there will never be digital images for everything, but this hypothetical question can help us better understand the needs of scholars whose research depends upon some aspect of the physical artifact itself. Thank you very much for your help, Jan Paris Conservator for Special Collections Wilson Library University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:67 Distributed: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 Message Id: cdl-17-67-026 ***Received on Wednesday, 21 April, 2004