Subject: Cleaning metal
Melissa Marsh Heaver <mmheaver [at] aol__com> writes >In my spare time, I am on the Vestry of my local church. We have a >nickel and silver alloy cross, c. 1957, that hangs from the ceiling. > ... > >It has been taken down for Lent, and stored. We hope to have it >cleaned and probably relacquered, as it hasn't been down in at least >15 years. The local person the church wants to do the job is >suggesting that it be cleaned via "sand-blasting", but with glass >beads. Is this a wise idea, or will we be removing metal? If this >method isn't a good idea, is there anything else we can use to clean >it and get the grunge off? Are you sure this is a nickel silver alloy rather than 'nickel silver' another common term for a cupro nickel alloy that is usually electroplated with silver (In the UK such stuff is often stamped 'EPNS' = 'electroplated nickel silver' If the cross does have a thin electrodeposited layer of silver, any type of abrasive cleaning could remove all or part of this. These types of objects were commonly lacquered at the time of manufacture and as the lacquer layer become patchy with age (and cleaning) the tarnishing of the object can become irregular and pretty awful. If you took this to a normal silver repair workshop they would typically strip off the remaining lacquer (using chemical solvents if possible), clean and examine the silver plated layer and either repolish this with mild silver polishes or, if the plated layer was too thin and worn, strip this off and re-plate. Obviously if it were a 1557 cross, such a drastic approach would be unwise, but it is 1957 ... Of course that opens the whole debate about conservation ethics when religious objects are involved. Some cathedrals still prefer to turn to a goldsmith with a hammer and a soldering iron to repair their Medieval treasures, because the object and its use is sacred, they need it on Sunday and besides you can't honour God with a dented chalice. Tricky one, Jack Ogden Osmiridium Consultancy *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:64 Distributed: Thursday, April 1, 2004 Message Id: cdl-17-64-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 31 March, 2004