Subject: Interpreting spectrophotometry data
We recently purchased a spectrophotometer and have just begun using it to determine colour change in our photographs collections. With the help of Roy Perkinson's article Statistics Without Anesthesia we have set up a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel which incorporates the standard deviation calculation and the student 't' test, and which tells us the delta E result before and after readings. We now have a mechanism for determining if a statistically significant change has occurred. My question is how important is that statistically significant change? We have had a loan request for ten 19th century photographs) for 4 venues,(approximately 300 days of exhibition). The photo images are in very good condition, and so, we have expressed concern about the lengthy exposure time. We will take readings of the photographs before and after each venue and have proposed that our museum reserve the right to remove any photo based on the results of the readings. Are we right in thinking that if two readings show that a statistically significant change has occurred that the photo is beginning to change and that the object should not be exhibited at the following venue? Or are we being too cautious and that just because a change is indicated doesn't mean that the object has changed perceptibly and that we should not immediately consider it damaged? Should we be establishing for ourselves what we consider to be an acceptable change? And if so, how would we quantify a change if we don't rely entirely on the statistical change indicator? I seem to be going around in circles but I would like to have a clear notion of what the spectrophotometer is really telling us so that I can transmit this info to our curators. Hopefully we'll all be able to agree and to proceed based on fact rather than on suspicion. Margaret Morris Senior Conservator Canadian Centre for Architecture 1920, rue Baile Montreal, Quebec H3H 2S6 514-939-7001ext.1239 Fax: 514-939-7020 *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:56 Distributed: Friday, February 20, 2004 Message Id: cdl-17-56-018 ***Received on Friday, 20 February, 2004