Subject: Obsolescence of photographic film
Frank A. Reynolds <fr0c [at] andrew__cmu__edu> writes >Does anyone have a really "practical estimate" of when Kodak (and/or >other major photographic film manufactures) will drop or scale down >their involvement in professional films? I put this question to Dou Corbin from the new Kodak Austin Division, formerly a company called Advanced Science Fiction that was purchased this spring by Kodak and that has been working on the Kiosk film and digital combinations that you will see soon. Doug is a former emulsion chemist who has worked at Kodak, Polaroid, and Itek. Here is his response to my query (which I am sending without permission): "Film is just like Mark Twain.... the reports of it's demise are greatly exaggerated! Kodak isn't phasing out film! But they're cutting back on film R&D quite a bit. I think all the film manufacturers are doing this. They're all putting more emphasis on output (paper, dye-sub, ink jet, CDs, etc) since output is common to both film and digital capture. As far as the ultimate stability goes, I would always make hardcopy of any digital file to a print material made by a major photo company (the people that really think about print stability). You can always scan the hardcopy later but you may not be able to decode an obsolete or corrupted picture file. I'll take my chances with fading dyes and redox blemishes. Those things are fairly restorable if not too bad. Believe me, Kodak will keep film going as long as possible since it's a top money maker for them. Part of buying us [Advanced Science Fiction] was to keep film alive longer. If you can go to a kiosk and get your film developed into prints and a CD of digital files in 10 min, that will add some digital pizzazz and instant gratification to film." M. Susan Barger, Ph.D. Small Museum Development Consultant Statewide Traveling Exhibitions Partnership Program TREX, Museum of New Mexico PO Box 2087 Santa Fe, NM 87504 505-476-5089 Fax: 505-476-5102 *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:34 Distributed: Thursday, October 16, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-34-003 ***Received on Thursday, 9 October, 2003