Subject: Albumen prints
Becky Cameron <becky_ann_cameron [at] hotmail__com> writes >I am currently preparing a treatment proposal for some albumen >prints. They have been adhered all over to poor quality paper (which >is not contemporary to them) and are creased from being unevenly >adhered. They would benefit from being removed from the backing >paper but they will likely curl, so I am currently thinking of >remounting them onto Japanese tissue of similar weight to the >prints. Could anyone suggest an alternative that they think would >be preferable? In France, we usually remount the albumen prints in a way that we call "montage evide" (scooped out mounting). A piece of permanent paper (around 250-300 g/m2) is scooped out according to the size of the photograph (plus a few mm, approximately). The photograph is fixed to this window from the back, with strips of light Japanese paper (9 g/m2 usually), using Klucel G in ethanol (8%). Klucel G doesn't provide water, so the albumen prints edge stay flat. You have to work fast because it evaporates quickly. Just be careful if you have some pencil annotations or stamps that can bleed with alcohol. The mounting (paper plus photograph) is then fixed in a window mat, along one edge of the paper with a Japanese paper, or a conservation tape. Here, you can make the window larger than the photograph, so that you can see the entire photograph (the mounting has to be perfect then) ; you can also make the window smaller if you don't want to see the edge of the photograph. I find this kind of mounting less intrusive than lining (unless you have to line the photograph because it is in such a poor state for example). I think also it takes you less time to do it. The result is nice, and you can easily open the mounting and see the back of the photograph. You can also easily dismount the scooped out mounting from its window mat, for example after an exhibition if you don't want to store it in the mounting (if you don't have a lot of storage space). And also this kind of mounting is easily reversible, because Klucel G is not as strong as methylcellulose or starch. Gwenola Furic Private photography conservator 4 bis, rue de Vincennes France *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:32 Distributed: Monday, October 6, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-32-003 ***Received on Thursday, 2 October, 2003