Subject: Color targets for digital imaging
Many color targets are available. Of these, the traditional Kodak Q-13 and Q-14 are the least valuable. I routinely use the GretagMacbeth ColorChecker, a 24-patch, 8 x 11.5 inch color target. It has individual matte surface color patches in a paper frame to prevent marring of the surface. They cost about $60-70 online, or from Calumet. The value of the ColorChecker is the 6-patch gray scale that is always neutral, and always the same from target to target. The Kodak Q-13 and Q-14 are never neutral and never have a consistent color cast from patch to patch, or from gray scale to scale, but they are "good enough" for film. The Kodak Q-60, IT8.7, color target has roughly 290 color patches but the grays are never neutral and never have a consistent color cast within a specific gray scale. However, you can download measured values from a Kodak FTP site for each target. Many Color Management tools in the $300-700 range use the IT 8.7 target (there are several target manufacturers). The Kodak version costs roughly the same as the ColorChecker. Kodak Q-60, 4x5 and 35mm transparency targets are also available; measured values are available online. In Photoshop, I use >Image>Adjust>Curves, to set individual RGB values of the six gray patches to: 243/243/243, 201/201/201, 161/161/161, 122/122/122, 85/85/85 and 53/53/53 (plus/minus 1-2 RGB units). This yields a density range of 1.7D at a gamma of 2.2: a very solid result. These values were developed by Robin Myers (a ColorSync co-creator) <URL:http://www.rmimaging.com/information/information_index.html>. I used them extensively to make inkjet printed surrogates that match the originals remarkably well. Artifacts generally have a density range well below 1.7D. If an original has deep darks with detail, suspect a greater density range. A different linear gamma will need to be applied to the gray patches, or the artifact's density range will be compressed using the above calibration. (You can generate these values in Excel, using Myers' base values as a guide. The white will stay the same, but the grays will have lower RGB values allowing for the denser darks in the original.) The ColorChecker is about 8 x 11.5 inches, but you only need about 1/2 x 9 inches in the frame to get the full gray scale. I use it for both scanning and digital photography. Generally, I suggest labeling files with corrected ColorChecker gray scales as "v0" at the end of the naming string; thus, those files without the notation are not corrected. There is a smaller version of the ColorChecker that costs about $100-120, but I have not used one. The digital version, ColorChecker DC, still has some problems, so it is best to say away for a while. The DC has many more patches, some are gloss to achieve a greater tonal range, but they can give serious reflection problems in some lighting situations. The DC costs roughly $300/420 (with calibration). GretagMacbeth suggests using InCamera software ($150) to make ICC profile using the ColorChecker DC or the regular ColorChecker. I have done this with success (using the BetterLight scanning back). A new profile is required for each new lighting setup. Tim Vitale Emeryville, CA 510-594-8277 *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:21 Distributed: Monday, August 18, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-21-001 ***Received on Monday, 18 August, 2003