Subject: UV monitors
I have a question that I have been researching and have not been able to find an answer to. I know when it comes to general recommended UV readings for museums 10 microwatts per lumen is optimum with 75 microwatts per lumen being the high end of the 'safe' range. Also, that many museums use the Crawford type 760 UV monitor. After getting some inconsistent readings from this meter I did some searching. I found out from a source that these meters can take misreadings and sometimes are effected by other factors such as some radio and other electromagnetic waves. Recently, we purchased a more accurate meter, the UVX Radiometer from UVP Ultra-Violet Products (this meter comes with certification of calibration)it takes readings in microwatts per cm squared. I have not been able to find any information on how to convert one measurement to the other and what safe readings would be for museums when measured in microwatts per cm squared. Also, I would mention our new meter has two sensor heads, one in the 250nm range and the other in the 360nm range. I have been told by the same source that readings with both sensors are needed to get a more complete picture of UV exposure. Finally, I was wondering on anyone's thoughts or experiences on currently developed lighting systems, such as filtered fiber optic projector systems for one and specially designed direct illumination bulbs engineered for coloration, reduced UV and IR levels for another. I would appreciate anything anyone could offer or any resources to point me towards. Peter Lundskow Conservator Indiana State Museum 650 W. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN 46204-2725 317-234-1726 *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:16 Distributed: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-16-004 ***Received on Tuesday, 29 July, 2003