Subject: Papyrus
This is in reference to the inquiry by Nicole Gilroy concerning mounting of collections of papyrus, especially fragments. Leyla Lau-Lamb wrote noting her experience with this issue who recommends the use of two sheets of glass which has been one of the most durable and traditional means of housing them. We have to thank her for sharing with us the experience of the Egyptian Museum in Berlin and their 30 years of use of this method. Amy Lubick recommended the Walters Museum's choice of shatterproof and UV-filtering glass plates and notes the Banik and Stachelberger article on salt migration at the Jubilee Conference in 1987. I also found a water-soluble whitish deposit on objects labeled "papyrus" in the old Sutro Baths collection in S.F. which had been purchased at the turn of the 20th century. These fragments turned out on examination not to be papyrus, but led me on a long search of the literature of the preparation methods of papyrus and surface conditioning. Various similar materials are described in the literature, like "bastard parchment" (see van Soest, 1984:49), or an alum-tawed leather or rawhide with chalk applied. In fact, Reed (1972:176) remarks that many authorities first regarded the Dead Sea Scroll fragments as papyrus. See also Betty Haines remarks in Recent Advances in Leather Conservation, 1984. An interesting and full report on a conservation treatment of papyrus that I found useful years ago was that by Debra Evans, Doris Hamburg and Meredith Mickelson, A Papyrus treatment, Art Conservation Training Programs Conference paper, 1980. As for the mounting issue, Geoffrey Brown reported on his work in Conservation DistList Instance: 7:78 Wednesday, April 27, 1994, in response to a similar question by Cheri Vitez. See below; it would be interesting to know if others used this and how they felt about it. Goeffry condemns glass and this should be considered, though I know of no studies which have quantified his report. Geoffrey I. Brown <geoffrey.i.brown [at] um__cc__umich__edu> writes >In reply to Cheri Vitez's inquiry about papyrus, I have been >experimenting with methods of supporting or mounting papyrus in/on sheer >polyester fabrics such as Stabiltex. My most recent effort involved a >low-pressure sandwich of Stabiltex stretched on a frame over the papyrus >and a padded backing of stabiltex over polyester batting over acid-free >corrugated board (two layers glued cross-grain). This worked very well >and was quite attractive. Experiments with different colors of fabric >revealed that the black stabiltex increases contrast (similar to >glare-reducing computer screens) and makes the papyrus more readable, >while lighter colors that matched the papyrus color tended to make the >writing blurred and muddy-looking. It is also possible to sandwich >papyrus between two layers of stabiltex mounted tautly on frames. The >support is not as good as with a padded backing but the reverse stays as >visible as the front. > >The old glass sandwiches are very destructive. They generally become >high-humidity traps and support continual fungus growth. Sometimes the >surface of the papyrus adheres to the glass or the glass can "ferrotype" >or planish the surface of the papyrus. When these mounts are >disassembled, one often finds that the glass has been etched by fungus >enzymes in a pattern matching the papyrus. Imagine what those enzymes >are doing to the papyrus! I do know that the University of California, Berkeley was restoring their collection of papyrus in 1996 (reported in WAAC News). These had been encased in Vinylite. The conservators, led by Nancy Harris, removed the 1,600 individual documents from these enclosures and transferred them to glass. Nancy could be contacted for more information. Niccolo Caldararo Director and Chief Conservator Conservation Art Service *** Conservation DistList Instance 17:8 Distributed: Tuesday, July 1, 2003 Message Id: cdl-17-8-003 ***Received on Sunday, 29 June, 2003