Subject: Adhesive for exterior woodwork
Rian Deurenberg <rdeurenberg [at] philamuseum__org> writes >I am investigating adhesives to be used in the treatment of four >exterior ionic capitals (attr. to Bernard and Jugiez, ca. 1765), >carved in vertical grained southern yellow pine. ... I've had very good success using ConServ flexible epoxy (ConServ Flexible Epoxy Patch 200). It is more of a filler than an actual adhesive although bonding properties are excellent. I've got fills in place outside in exposed conditions for more than ten years now with no sign of failure--no separation at the interface or degradation of the material itself. Workability is decent but not what I would call easy although I have worked molded surfaces on it. It is very slow setting (several days depending on temp and RH). Gap-filling qualities are excellent as you might expect being a filler. The material comes with both fumed silica and also a cellulose-based material for bulking it up which can be done more less according to application. The cellulose helps with "carvability". I probably don't need to warn you about fumed silica but will anyhow--nasty stuff--*extremely* fine--I sometimes refer to it as "weaponized" silica because it becomes air-borne so readily. I use a respirator when mixing it in. It takes paint very well, I have had no problems with paint adherance using either oil-based or acrylic latex. The material is intended to be used with a flexible epoxy consolidant and the instructions state that any fill applications should be preceded by treatment with their consolidant(ConServ Flexible Epoxy Consolidant 100. However, if no consolidation is required, I've found that applying the filler in the mixed, liquid state (before bulking up) to the surfaces provides a good bond by allowing the material "wet in" when the filler is applied. This saves mixing up two different materials as the consolidant epoxy is a different formulation than the filler. As far as reversibility is concerned--as with any epoxy--it is limited although being flexible it would be easier to dig out than the harder epoxies. Speaking of which, I have used other epoxies bulked up with fumed silica as fillers notably Abatron and West System and have found them to be poor filler materials with separations typically occurring at the interface rather quickly, allowing water infiltration than then leads to more problems developing in a predictable fashion. I have also found the same to be true of polyester resin based materials (body filler) when used outside. Robert Self Architectural Conservator Monticello Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-984-9851 *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:75 Distributed: Thursday, May 29, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-75-005 ***Received on Wednesday, 28 May, 2003