Subject: New technologies for conservation of artifacts damaged in Iraq
Kelly Hearn <kwhearn [at] yahoo__com> writes >I am writing a story for United Press International looking at what >new technologies--if any--could be used to restore damaged artifacts >in Iraq. Are there any nanotechnology applications being used, for >example? I heard recently that much of the work is still done the >old fashioned way--with glue. Anyway, I am desperate to find some >clues here. Again, what kinds of technologies are being used to >restore damaged artifacts? Any pointers would be greatly >appreciated, I know being assigned this story isn't your fault but as a member of the library and cultural community I have to express my despair at a story like this being worked up. It distinctly recalls rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The bigger story is why this happened. Why were the artifacts looted and damaged? Why were they not protected? What cultural values are visible when an occupying responsible power protects the revenue ministries but not the cultural ministries, even when warned in advance (both long term and short term?). Perhaps we can save or reconstruct some small portion of these artifacts. What is necessary to be sure it won't happen again? Where is our press in asking the tough questions and writing the tough commentary about a secretary of defense who wonders if there really are that many vases in Iraq? With sorrow, Peter S. Graham University Librarian Syracuse University *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:64 Distributed: Friday, April 25, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-64-003 ***Received on Thursday, 24 April, 2003