Subject: Salaries
Ramon Duncan-Huse wrote that "it has been very difficult to get pre-program or graduate students to consider internships in Midwest conservation labs" and similarly Pete Lundskow wrote that he has found it difficult to fill a permanent conservation position at the Indiana State Museum. My experience has been similar working in the Midwest and West the past 25 years. I don't fault a recent graduate student for seeking a job at a prestigious institution,but as the job market continues to over-saturate, I think it would be prudent to at least consider smaller museums and state institutions. On the flip side, generally, if these places want to attract quality conservators,more resources should be allocated to the cause. It is very discouraging and frustrating--I speak from experience--working in a place where even though the salary may be adequate or even great, getting equipment,supplies etc., is difficult, if not impossible. In summary, I believe an attitude adjustment may be needed in many cases, especially among the uninitiated recent program graduates (there are treasures to be conserved outside the hallowed galleries of art museums nationwide) and the smaller museums and institutions need to recognize (even more) the need for conservation and dip into their institutional pockets a little deeper. I would be interested in knowing about any studies done on comparing the cost of conservation for a museum who has staff conservators versus the cost of contracting the same work to private conservators or regional labs. I think a strong case could be made for good salaries and in-house conservation departments based on this. *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:64 Distributed: Friday, April 25, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-64-002 ***Received on Friday, 25 April, 2003