Subject: Qualifications for conservation technicians
Deborah Rohan <deborah.rohan [at] cambridgeshire__gov__uk> writes >I would like to ask conservators in other establishments and >countries what they would look for in a conservation technician, and >how they would assess the necessary skills. What work should a >technician know how to do? What judgements should he be expected to >make? How would a technician's salary compare with a sole or senior >conservator's? During the late 1980's I suggested a conservation technician training program to one of the directors of a local community college (2 year program, leading to an associates degree) and he was very interested, but there was no funding. My reason for making this proposal is that most of the work which a conservator actually executes at the bench does not require much in the way of theory, chemistry, art history, etc. Good manual skills, good color vision and eyesight, and intuition are among the necessary skill set. My belief is that conservation training would best serve the artifacts we work upon if it were to be broken down into three aspects: Bench work, after technical education, including a basic grounding in the nature and development of materials used in the creation of art and artifacts, and apprenticeship at institutions or private labs, leading to an associate degree as a conservation technician. Lab management, following additional education, covering theory, chemistry, art history, lab design (to include sources of supply, budgeting, personnel management,) etc. leading to a bachelor degree as a conservator. Graduate programs should be left to those who can best make use of university chemistry and physics labs and library facilities to conduct research of value to the profession in advancing the care of artifacts. A conservation technician's salary should be no less than 2/3rds of a supervising conservator's salary. Thompson Conservation Lab. 7549 N. Fenwick Portland, Oregon 97217 USA 503-735-3942 (phone/fax) *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:55 Distributed: Friday, March 28, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-55-001 ***Received on Friday, 28 March, 2003