Subject: Preserving heritage and resolving conflicts
This is a question for the conservation community about the judgment given by supreme court of India over a land dispute which led to violent communal riots and demolition of a mosque built in 1528 in Ayodhya, India. On the basis of an Archaeological Survey of India report, the Hindu religious groups claim that the mosque was built on the site of a temple believed to be the birth place of an important Hindu deity. The mosque was demolished in 1992. The supreme court of India on the basis of archaeological evidence has given an order to excavate the land around the disputed structure (now demolished) and collect further evidence if any for the remains of a temple. In a country like India where virtually every structure may be standing on layers of history is it wise to excavate or demolish existing structures? What role can conservators play in resolving such conflicts? Aparna Tandon Curator-conservator Amar Mahal Museum and Library India *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:52 Distributed: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-52-021 ***Received on Wednesday, 5 March, 2003