Subject: Certification
Certification--a growth industry Should we AIC members, Professional Associates and Fellows embrace certification of not only ourselves but also other professionals who may become our "technical consultants"? Should that large group include architects, engineers, chemists, scientists of all types, arborists, landscape architects and hydrologists? I think so. From many years experience, I am convinced that those in other professions who work regularly, or even occasionally, with conservators should also be "certified" or at least exposed to a specialized secondary education. Take engineers like I was. Engineers are mostly bad bets to make it in the field of conservation without education in the conservation science and a lot of exposure to typical and a-typical conservation problems and suitable solutions. We old aircraft types know strength of materials, weights, kinematics, statics, dynamics and aerodynamics, flutter, wind tunnels, pressures, microelectronics, computers, data plotting, blueprints, materials, statistics, and engineering drawings. Since 1959 when I was a practicing aircraft structures engineer, some truly great conservators showed me the error of my engineering ways in their field. Later I won a competition to "reinstall" a mangled, almost completely ruined, large wind-and water-driven Alexander Calder mobile, "Hello Girls", for LACMA Conservation Center. I then learned from Dr. Pieter Meyers and objects conservator Steve Colton that engineers designing repairs in artworks must guarantee that the repair will fail *first* under load, before the original artwork does. Failure must be *first* in the repairs whether the loads are compression, tension, shear or bearing. My engineering educators at Ohio State and Purdue taught that such a thought would end my career! Repairs are to last beyond the life of the product. Not in art conservation. How about a test engineer watching his test rigging fail *before* the test specimen? Wrong again for you test engineers. The rigging must also fail *first* before the artwork! How about trying to bond thousands of rocks and chunks of debris together into a load-carrying structure just because the pieces are "historic"? Forget that, it is not only nearly impossible but if he finds out I recommended that, my Purdue structures professor, Elmer Bruhn, would turn over in his grave! OK. So what if we AICers are forced to also certify these dummies as conservator-helpers? What will that cost each of them? I guess the cost will be tax-deductible? In any case we must solve that one along with the other issues as we toddle toward certification. Bud Goldstone, AIC Prof. Assoc., Los Angeles, CA *** Conservation DistList Instance 16:42 Distributed: Friday, January 10, 2003 Message Id: cdl-16-42-003 ***Received on Friday, 10 January, 2003