Subject: Lime painting on plaster
I would agree fully with the sentiment that one should have a clear understanding of the environmental factors involved with the deterioration of the painting (in addition to any other contributory factors). However, if the loss of cohesion of the pigment layer is due to salt movement as a result of water vapour activity, then a consolidation technique such as limewatering which involves the use very high levels of liquid water appears rather curious. Even a saturated solution of limewater contains only a tiny percentage of calcium hydroxide, and despite extensive testing over many years, the efficacy of the treatment remains in doubt. Even assuming the treatment works in theory, if the painting is sensitive to moisture, then the introduction of the levels of water needed to carry an effective level of calcium hydroxide could be disastrous. With regard to nebulisers and other spray techniques, this presumably envisages the use of an organic consolidant (rather than an inorganic option such as limewater). Why are such widely differing treatments being suggested when there is no knowledge of the painting ? We come back to the same point I made in my original response. What is the painting made of? Why is it deteriorating ? Have the causes of deterioration been brought under control ? Only once these questions have been properly addressed should we be looking at possible treatment methods (let alone whether an organic or inorganic consolidant is appropriate). Tobit Curteis Associates 36 Abbey Road Cambridge CB5 8HQ UK +44 1223 501958 Fax: +44 1223 304190 *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:36 Distributed: Tuesday, November 6, 2001 Message Id: cdl-15-36-006 ***Received on Friday, 2 November, 2001