Subject: Dancing
Does anyone have any information on the likely impact of dancing on museum collections? The Events Manager at one of our historic house museums is keen to allow dancing at the private functions (wedding receptions etc) which take place at the property. The room where the dancing would take place does not contain any historic collections (but is adjacent to one which does) and the guests would not have access to the rooms containing collections. The Curator instinctively feels that people should not be allowed to have fun at our sites, and has asked my advice. My first guess is that the effects of dancing could be compared to a small earthquake. Looking at web sites dealing with the effects of earthquakes (eg <URL:http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/mercalli.html>, it appears that even the most energetic dancing would not exceed Mercalli intensity level III * characterised as being felt quite noticeably by people indoors, vibration similar to a passing heavy truck. This corresponds to a Richter magnitude of 4.2, pretty small beer as earthquakes go. In terms of shock and vibration, this level corresponds to a maximum acceleration of 0.02g and a maximum peak particle velocity of 20mm s-1, and these relate to measurements on the dance floor itself, not objects in an adjoining room, where the effects would be expected to be very much smaller. So how much vibration can a painting (for example) take? Stefan Michalski (see Art in Transit (1991), p 238) tried vibrating a dummy painting at a maximum acceleration of 1g for 20 days. When this had no effect, he tried more vigorous shaking at 2.5g for 6 hours, and even this caused no perceptible damage. Only after continuing this level of vibration for more than 2 days did visible cracks appear in the paint layer. It would appear that an acceleration 50 to 100 times smaller than this would have no effect whatever. (And this is the acceleration that would be experienced if the painting were screwed to the dance floor.) My feeling therefore is that the effects of vibration caused by dancing can be discounted, since the accelerations caused are smaller than those caused by earthquakes, which are presumably accepted as part of daily life by curators in California and Japan, for example. Dr Barry Knight Senior Conservation Scientist English Heritage +44 20 7973 3000 Fax: +44 20 7973 3001 *** Conservation DistList Instance 15:6 Distributed: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 Message Id: cdl-15-6-010 ***Received on Friday, 22 June, 2001