Subject: SCMRE
**** Moderator's comments: Please respond directly to Elizabeth Stone <ecstone [at] rcn__com> At last someone has come up with a sensible way of handling email petitions. If you would like to join this protest against the Smithsonian cuts, please read the enclosed letter (below) and send your name, dept and university or company to ecstone [at] rcn__com, not to me. From: Elizabeth Stone <ecstone [at] rcn__com> Subject: Proposed Smithsonian closings Date: 26 Apr 2001 Hi, I'm managing a letter to be sent to try to stop the Smithsonian from closing their center for object conservation and materials science. I enclose the text below. If you are willing to have your names added as signatures, could you email me back with your name, title, department and university all on different lines, so that I can cut and paste them into the letter. Also if you have a broader email circulation list for other archaeologists, could you send it out to them to see if they want to be added. The more names we can get the better. The board of the Smithsonian meets on May 6th, the letter is addressed to Renquist, who is the chairman of the board, with copies to the Secretary, the other members of the board and the congressmen and senators in the oversight committees. If you have already written to them either regarding this, or to the proposed closing of the conservation biology part of the zoo, that does not matter, since this is a letter signed by a broader constituency. Here is the text: The undersigned archaeologists strongly urge a reconsideration of the decision by Smithsonian Secretary Lawrence Small to close the Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education (SCMRE). SCMRE performs a critical role in the two central missions of the Smithsonian: 1. to enable the holding of "artifacts and scientific specimens in trust for 'the increase and diffusion of knowledge'", and 2. To serve as "a center for research dedicated to public education, national service, and scholarship in the arts, sciences, and history." The collections of the Smithsonian attract large numbers of visitors every year who expect to increase their knowledge of the arts, science and history through their interaction with the exhibits. The long term care of these collections must, then, be a top priority in meeting the Smithsonian's responsibility for the stewardship of the nation's treasures. At its inception SCMRE (then known as the Conservation Analytical Laboratory--CAL) served as the only conservation laboratory for most of the Institution. With the development of individual museum based conservation programs, SCMRE's mandate was changed to focus its efforts in collection care on developing new techniques of conservation, examining larger questions of the long term viability of materials in museum environments, and building a high impact training program in conservation and conservation science. The work has been of direct benefit not only to the constellation of arts and science museums of the Smithsonian, but to museums around the country and the world. Surely leadership in the science of object conservation is a natural and expected role for the Smithsonian. In fact, there is no other center for conservation science in the country that fills this need. SCMRE also plays a critical role in bringing scholars in the arts and humanities together with the techniques and approaches of the natural and physical sciences. Materials research conducted at SCMRE applies cutting edge analytical methods, such as neutron activation analysis, electron microscopy and molecular biology to the study of archaeological artifacts, skeletal remains, and other materials. Through this process, the artifacts held by the Smithsonian and at museums and universities worldwide, can be made to tell far richer stories relating to the history of technology, methods of manufacture, the process of trade and exchange, and the evolution of our own species. The training and outreach component of this work, engaging Native Americans and Latinos in the study of their own material cultural heritage, has served as a model for the inclusion of wider constituencies in scientific research. Once again there is no other comparable center in the United States since the range of expertise represented, and the range of techniques developed in the SCMRE is not possible in a university setting where the departmental structure makes such interdisciplinary work very difficult. It seems to us extraordinarily short sighted to cut an internationally respected research center with so broad and critical a role for the maintenance and study of museum materials. The proposed cuts would not only greatly diminish the Smithsonian's ability to maintain and study its own collections, but would leave the Nation without an institution that would ensure that these skills were passed on to the rest of the country. Again, we strongly urge you to reconsider the decision to close the SCMRE. Helena Jaeschke Archaeological Conservator *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:57 Distributed: Friday, April 27, 2001 Message Id: cdl-14-57-003 ***Received on Friday, 27 April, 2001