Subject: Freezing objects
The National Museum of the American Indian is freezing a large number of ethnographic objects for preventive pest control as part of a five-year move project. Some types of materials, such as wool, are routinely frozen, while others (tooth for example) are not frozen due to the risk of damage. A wool dress with elk tooth decoration would be a candidate for freezing because wool is attractive to the pests known to be present in the old storage facility, but we would hesitate to freeze an object with elk teeth for fear the teeth might crack. The move project is facing many such scenarios, and has begun to investigate the issue more closely, with the intention of sharing the results with the rest of the museum community. Could those of you who have seen damage caused by freezing for pest control please share your observations? The damage we are concerned about includes cracking, crack propagation, delamination, fatty bloom, spew (spue for some of us), loss of adhesion, exacerbation of bead disease and so forth. As Gali Beiner recently mentioned, there is little in the literature regarding damage to artifact materials from freezing. I would be delighted to talk with others interested in addressing that gap. Ellen Roblee Mellon Fellow in Conservation National Museum of the American Indian 301-238-6624 x 6288 *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:51 Distributed: Tuesday, April 3, 2001 Message Id: cdl-14-51-019 ***Received on Tuesday, 27 March, 2001