Subject: Private practice in institutional lab
Anne Lane <alane [at] rhtc__net> writes >One of the thoughts being bandied about our institution right now is >the concept of establishing a dual-duty conservation lab as part of >a proposed new storage facility in a renovated school building. The >proposal is to hire a staff conservator who, in addition to caring >for our own stuff, would take on private commissions using the same >facility. I have read the initial responses to this thread with interest as I had seen the effects of the introduction of private practice within the institution I had been employed at for 15 years (I left last year to take a position at a regional lab). I agree with all of the previous postings of my colleagues. I believe that the introduction of accepting private work within a non-profit museum/institution has a corrosive effect of the staff and their ability to care for the institution's collections. Initially such an idea is attractive to management--conservation for hire is seen as a battery that can energize a departmental budget. In my former institution it was presented as a staffing strategy--one in which post-graduate interns would be hired, have to conduct contract work to pay for their salaries, and whatever remaining time would be available for work on the institution's collections. The staff was promised that the lab managers would not be involved in the treatments/contracts etc. and that anyone on staff could refuse the contract work if they thought it adverse to the treatments for exhibitions or monitoring and caring for the collection. The staff was also promised that they could still pursue private work on their off time and that this would not constitute a conflict of interest because it was recognized that the staff was paid below the salaries established by a market survey. Needless to say, what was first proposed shortly changed and tremendous pressure was brought to bear on everyone to pursue contract work. The scenario became reversed and lab managers were then told to take on contract projects in order to gain the funds to be able to hire interns to help with exhibition treatments in addition to contract work. The staff was required to complete conflict of interest forms. Such practice can also lead to conflicts with curatorial and collections management staff because there is less time to tend to their needs (Plus, their expertise was being offered to clients as an incentive). Several of the conservators, including myself, also thought that clients were being charged far more than necessary for treatments. Since my departure last year I have heard from several former colleagues that their labs have been turned into "Cash Cows". I can only urge you to really, really be careful when considering this option. It is a slippery slope that is an attractive one for an ambitious manager's career but just like a battery it can corrode to the point that it oozes acid over all concerned. David Harvey The Art Conservation Center at the University of Denver 2420 S. University Blvd. Denver, CO 80208 303-733-2712 *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:39 Distributed: Monday, January 22, 2001 Message Id: cdl-14-39-002 ***Received on Tuesday, 16 January, 2001