Subject: Slides of storage conditions
Ken Myers <kenmyers [at] mindspring__com> writes >It is our hope that we will be able to convince our Board to pay >attention to the care and storage of our collection as an >institutional priority. Present storage is insufficient and >conditions are deplorable in many ways. In response to Ken Myers concerning raising awareness of board members regarding poor collection storage conditions I offer our experience in a similar situation. Ten years ago a large portion of our approximately thirty thousand objects collection had suffered through decades of poor storage conditions. Beyond moving collections around and covering them as short term solutions to environmentally caused deterioration it was clear that the only course was to begin planning for new storage facilities. Of course, money was an issue but a well-developed concept needed to precede asking for money. This is critical if you are to stand up to the many tough questions that should, and most likely will, be asked during the process. In our case the concept was for a 'collections first' approach in contrast to an exhibit weighted one. The logic here is that if you do not protect your collections now eventually there will be nothing to exhibit in the future. In our situation as a municipal government operated museum/Living History Site we had to convince local politicians rather than board members. To shorten a long story we decided to offer our site as a location for a council meeting after which we would take the politicians on a tour of the worst storage environments. I don't think one needs any particular training to understand the potential for deterioration in a barn filled to the rafters with artifacts many of which were covered in dust, water stains, racoon tracks and random piles of excrement. Your situation may not be as bad but there is no doubt that experiencing the sight (and smell) of such a site will go further in convincing people than a comfy slide show after lunch. Photographs are helpful but don't leave out the face to face experience. There is a certain sense of shame that can occur that, although not pleasant, does reflect the responsibility these people have in maintaining community or private collections. In some cases board members may have direct legal responsibility for damage to museum collections. This sobering fact could bring immediate attention to the matter. If citizens donate artifacts to a public museum surely they should expect accountability in the ongoing care of their objects. The idea is to preserve these historic collections for future as well as current generations. This must be understood by governing bodies. Five years ago we were successful in getting a 35,000 sq.ft. storage facility,offices and conservation labs. Of course, there may be other factors in achieving the facilities you require besides convincing board members and having a good plan. Perhaps other people's experience will be helpful here. Good luck with your project, May I add another suggestion; You didn't mention collection policies in your message. If these are not in place this may be a good time to create them. A strong Conservation Policy can provide the professional museological reference and consequent motivation for improvements to your collections storage areas. Preservation should also be a part of a comprehensive Collections Management Policy. If your board simply doesn't understand the problems perhaps inviting them to a workshop on care of collections or basic conservation would help enlighten them. Also, as well as showing them your inadequate storage conditions in person take them on a field trip to the nearest museum with good storage environments--again, seeing for themselves may help the penny drop. Richard Fuller Conservator, Doon Heritage Crossroads, Kitchener,Ontario, Canada N2G 3W5 519-748-1914 ext. 230 *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:37 Distributed: Tuesday, January 9, 2001 Message Id: cdl-14-37-005 ***Received on Thursday, 4 January, 2001