Subject: Identification of photomechanical plate
Marta Barandiaran <uppbalam [at] lgdx04__lg__ehu__es> writes >I have bought two silver plates which carry an image etched with >some kind of photomechanical process. They have been inked and then >cleaned as you would do to print any etching but the ink has been >let to dry in the plates, so that you can see the image perfectly. >The image is made of little dots which are quite irregular. I >suppose that the plates were made to be given to the client because >silver is too soft and expensive to be used as an engraving plate >and the composition of the images is not thought to be reversed in >the act of printing. Can anybody help me to identify the process >used to make them? Often times when a photomechanical image is put on a a metal plate to be etched, in the very black areas (or areas that would print black), the dot pattern becomes too fine and when dropped in the acid to be etched tiny dots float away. Having experienced this myself the solution was to use some sort of aquatint method or mezzotint method to make the area black again. This was usually done after the first "bite" so you could see what areas to mask off for the aquatint (and several methods include spray paint or the pine rosin method). These methods of aquatint leave an irregular dot pattern where as the mezzotint is more patterned. You will find this to be true especially if you see a photo dot pattern in the gray areas on the rest of the plate. Also, the negative may be a straight line shot which means there is no dot pattern, It was a high contrast black and white translation and the dark areas were all filled in with aquatint. A local print facility at a college or fine art print shop could look at this for you and also help you identify. Carol Crawford, Library of Congress *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:49 Distributed: Wednesday, December 2, 1998 Message Id: cdl-12-49-010 ***Received on Tuesday, 1 December, 1998