Subject: Flaking ink on manuscript
Of the two conditions mentioned ("Either the binder in the inks has failed, or is not adhering to the surface of the vellum.") it is most likely that the ink was produced without sufficient binder. If the pigments were also flaking I would suspect that the skin was sheep and that some fats/oils remained in the skin, more or less repelling water-based inks/paints. However, there is another possibility. If the area where the ink was put down shows where the ink had been (i.e., if the surface was destroyed there by the ink before it flaked away) it is likely that too much ferrous sulfate (copperas) was used in compounding the ink. This can easily happen if the person making the ink used dehydrated ferrous sulfate in a recipe which assumed that crystalline ferrous sulfate would be used. The resultant ink would contain approximately 35% more sulfuric acid than if the crystalline form had been used. I have not seen very many exemplars which exhibit this problem, and have not seen this one so I hesitate to go much further. If there are a few flakes laying around in the gutters of the book, it would be useful to have them analysed for the presence of glycerine (suggesting the use of wine, vinegar, ale, etc. to extract tannic acid from galls or bark) and/or gums (gum arabic, cherry or plum gum, etc.). It is also possible that no binder was used. Solutions to the problem depend, in part, on the answers to these questions. Jack C. Thompson Thompson Conservation Lab. Portland, OR 97217 503-735-3942 (voice/fax) *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:10 Distributed: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 Message Id: cdl-12-10-001 ***Received on Saturday, 11 July, 1998