Subject: Hygrothermographs
In response to Sean Harrison's query regarding the use of hygrothermographs, the Royal Ontario Museum has been using the ACR Smartreader 2 dataloggers for some years. Some are used to monitor specific situations, such as cold storage, continuously. Others are used as needed to provide information on a gallery, shipping crate, or display case on a short-term basis. To date we have been very pleased with their performance. They are small enough to be placed in a display case without being too visually obtrusive. The Windows version of the software produces neat, professional-looking graphs with a colour printer. A laptop computer can be used to download the data 'in situ', so that the dataflow is not interrupted by having to bring the logger to a PC. It is necessary to keep an eye on the calibration, which inevitably drifts over time, as indeed it does for most kinds of monitoring equipment. We have found it necessary to have some kind of benchmark or standard with which to compare the dataloggers on a regular basis. Less happy experiences include having to put the sheet of paper through the printer twice in order to print the statistics (high, low, mean, range) on the same sheet as the graph itself, which is a nuisance, but nothing more, and the fact that the remote sensor is fractionally too large to pass through the size of probe-hole which we chose to be the institutional standard for our display cases, which may be a difficulty peculiar to this institution, and in any case is not insurmountable. Unfortunately I cannot help with the other devices listed, but I would be glad to discuss the ACR loggers further if required. Helen Coxon Conservator Royal Ontario Museum Toronto 416-586-5897 *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:9 Distributed: Thursday, July 9, 1998 Message Id: cdl-12-9-003 ***Received on Friday, 3 July, 1998