Subject: Communication of conservation information
As I was reading Jack Thompson's recent effort to establish what he called "a context for the discussion" on the debate regarding quality of questions on the distribution list, I had to wonder what he meant by "AIC is renewing a drive for professionalism, which always occurs at the expense of the profession. One need only study history to learn that lesson." This is a very significant statement which carries a lot of hidden insinuations. I think we could all benefit from him being a bit more specific. Does he mean the history of the AIC? Certainly the pursuit of professionalism in general can not be blamed, in general, for the woes of all professions or callings through out history. Indeed without such a pursuit, would we have professions? Standards of practice? Agreements of integrity and assurances of quality? What exactly is the context which is being attempted here? Jerry Podany Head of Antiquities Conservation J. Paul Getty Museum *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:92 Distributed: Thursday, May 14, 1998 Message Id: cdl-11-92-009 ***Received on Thursday, 7 May, 1998